Today’s Personal Injury 101 is all about compensation. The Collateral Source Rule ensures that money awarded to a plaintiff in a lawsuit will not be reduced if he or she receives additional compensation for the same injury from another source.
That other source will typically be insurance, workman’s compensation or Social Security.
As with pretty much anything, there are critics against the collateral source rule. In fact, some states have pushed to make the principle obsolete. (Some tried to lobby Nevada’s legislature last year to abolish the rule here, but thankfully that effort failed.)
Nevada has adopted a “per se” rule that bars the admission of a collateral source payment for a loss or injury into evidence for any purpose.
One purpose of the rule is to make sure it is the injured party who gets the benefit of having purchased insurance, not the party inflicting the injury.
In 2012 the Nevada Supreme Court reaffirmed that payment from worker’s compensation is an exception to the collateral source rule. The specifics behind this exception are confusing so be sure to contact a qualified attorney, such as a member of our team at Parry & Pfau, to go over your case.
Zachariah B. Parry is an attorney and founding partner at the law firm Parry & Pfau and is an adjunct professor who teaches torts, contracts, and Nevada practice and procedure for UNLV’s paralegal program. He can be reached at 702-912-4451 or email@example.com.